Monday, July 14, 2014

French Connections: US Independence & French Bastille Day

The interconnected aspects of our genealogical family continue to intrigue. Nowhere is this more evident than through our French connections.  So, we use the occasion of France’s Bastille Day, July 14, comparable to United States (US) Independence Day, July 4, to explore French – US relationships, bearing in mind that each nation might not exist without the other. Second, we use the opportunity to discuss our genealogical ties to France. Perhaps our extended families, and others in our genealogy network, might find some of this interesting. 

On July 4, 2014, as this is being written, the US celebrates the 238th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, severing ties to the British Monarchy, and beginning a long, bloody and tortuous path, eventually leading to a new form of government, giving power and influence to ordinary people, embodying the principles of democratic republicanism – a work still in progress.

During our revolution not everyone was convinced about the wisdom of the enterprise. Most historians surmise about 35-40 percent of the colonials favored the revolution, about 20-25 percent were against it, while some 30-40 percent were less than enthusiastic, or neutral. William’s own 5X ggf, Philip Lambert of VA (a 1754 English emigrant), was suspected of being less than enthusiastic. However, after being fined a large portion of his tobacco crop for his ambiguity, apparently decided to cast his lot with the rebels, took an oath of support for “the cause” and served in the colonial militia.

In any event, few Americans on this 4th of July understand that France and the US enjoy a common historical bond. The blood and idealism of both nations have been indelibly and irrevocably mixed over the years. Without the immense economic, military and political assistance of France the outcome of the American Colonial uprising of 1776 undoubtedly would have been different. The British defeat at Yorktown, for example, could never have happened. Thus, the French played a significant role in our revolution, making possible the Treaty of Paris of 1783, finally ending the American Revolution, which resulted in American Independence.

Ironically, French aid to the colonists stirred anti-Monarchy notions among their own people, thereby seeding the French Revolution, which began July 14, 1789, and since 1790 celebrated as Bastille Day, or La Fête Nationale (French National Day). Proclaiming the motto: "Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité" (Liberty, Equality and Fraternity) to a resplendent blue, white and red (Tricolor) ensign. Thus, both nations became bonded by attributions of political ideology and kindred spirit, forged in the American Revolution.

Eventually, the United States was able to “repay” the French contribution to US independence.
In both World Wars I and II the outcome almost certainly would have been different for France without US assistance. This was poignantly summarized when US troops arrived in France in 1917. During July 4 ceremonies at the Marquis de Lafayette’s tomb, Colonial Stanton, an officer with General “Blackjack” Perishing’s’ US Expeditionary Forces, declared, “Lafayette, we are here”, thus acknowledging the famous French nobleman’s profound and decisive contribution to our own revolutionary war. The Immaculately and reverently tended graves of many thousands of US service members in Normandy and other locations in France continue to remind the two nations of common bonds.

The Statue of Liberty, known and prized throughout the world for its symbolism, is a gift from the French citizens to the American people, authenticating the two nation’s love for liberty, equality and fraternity. President Grover Cleveland (Jennie’s ancestor) spoke at the statue’s unveiling in New York harbor on October 28, 1886, noting that the statues’ "stream of light shall pierce the darkness of ignorance and man's oppression until Liberty enlightens the world". (However, as we suggested above, and noted so vigorously in the press at the time, liberty remains a work in progress.)

NOW,  FOR A SAMPLER OF OUR  GENEALOGICAL FRENCH CONNECTIONS

In genealogy, a “gateway” ancestor is one that spins off, or leads, to other ancestors in web-like connections through history. We have discovered a number of gateway ancestors that have led to even more gateways in an historical spiral that constantly reveals new networks. This brief summary of some French connections provides a sample.

Through a combination of both our ancestors, we are related to essentially all of the royalty and nobility of Europe, including Denmark, Sweden, Scandinavia, Ireland, Scotland, England, Wales, Spain, Netherlands, Flanders, modern France, large portions of modern Germany, northern Italy, the Alsace/Lorraine region, and portions of Western Europe and the Mediterranean basin/Middle East. Moreover, our pedigrees are inter–connected throughout this ancestral amalgam. An interesting aspect, however, is that the territory that constitutes modern France has been at the crossroads of all of these connections.

Although modern geographical France is a relatively recent nation, she has evolved out of many kingdoms, fiefdoms and nationalities, including Vikings, Celts, Germanic tribes, Romans, and others. Our ancestry involves all of these. Both of us have traced “French”- associated ancestors to the time of Roman Gaul. Among our French “gateways” are Charlemagne (742-814), John Gaunt Plantagenet, Duke of Aquitaine (1340-1399) and the Danish Viking Rollo (846-931). (The history channel’s The Vikings provides an historical treatment of Rollo) This Viking is William, Jr.’s  29 great grandfather (ggf) on his maternal (Havens) side, and Jennie’s 34th ggf through her paternal (Bush) line (Normandy France was named for Rollo (Norseman) after he was given the area by Francia King Charles III (879-929). Rollo, (aka, Robert I of Normandy), was the 3X ggf father of the Duke of Normandy, aka William the Conqueror) (1028-1087). William the Conqueror is William Jr.’s  24th ggf. When Duke William “conquered” England in 1066 he became William I, King of England, thus combining a large segment of modern-day mid-W “France” and England. This was a gateway to virtually all the royalty and nobility of England and later the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. (As noted in previous blogs, both William and Jennie have separate genealogical lines to these English and Irish royals and nobles as well.)

Note on the pedigree charts below that Matilda, Countess of  D’Anjou, daughter of Henry I, married back into the “French” nobility and this reinforced the already incorporated central-W “French” province of Anjou into the English-French nobility line.

Matilda of Anjou was mother of Henry II, King of England.  Eleanor of Aquitaine (1122-1202), Jennie’s 26th great grandmother, was married to Henry II of England. So, in essence, Eleanor’s holdings, covering a large part of modern SW France, was under English dominion. Ever Since Edward III (1312 – 1377) (William, Jr. and Jennie’s ancestor) until 1801 Kings of England claimed the title of King of France as well.  [see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_claims_to_the_French_throne

William Jr.’s connection is further interesting in that his ancestors trace to France’s King Philip (Philippe III King of France Capet (1245 - 1285)). Additional connections to the French Monarchy are still being researched, but further connections to 1789 are looking promising.

NOTE: The following pedigree charts represent the latest examination of the William and Jennie Bush-Lambert genealogical connections through selected historical personages of European history. Minor tweaking may occur from time to time as new information is uncovered, regarding both the precise connectivity and details about the principals involved. Meanwhile, we think it accurately represents what is generally known, or can be known, about the subjects at this time. As this is always a work in progress, if anyone has knowledge of different information, or questions, please feel free to contact us.  For those with access to Ancestry.com, the underlined names provide links to our tree.

William James Lambert, Jr. – Pedigree Listing for One French / English Line
A Seperate Pedigree Listing for William’s specific ties to the French Monarchy Follows

Rollo "The Wise" Ragnvaldsson~, (830/46 - 931)
 [Viking – Scandinavia a.k.a. Denmark; Finland; Norway, Sweden]
   29th great grandfather 
William Longsword (900 - 943) son of Rollo "The Wise" Ragnvaldsson~,
Richard II 'The Good' Duke De Normandy (957 - 1027) son of Richard I "the Fearless" Duke of Normandy
Robert II Devil Magnificent Normandy (999 - 1038) son of Richard II 'The Good' Duke De Normandy
Duke of Normandy (1028 - 1087) (aka: William the Conqueror ; King William I of England) son of Robert II Devil Magnificent Normandy
Henry I Beauclerc King England (1068 - 1135) son of William the Conqueror
Henry II King of England (1133 - 1189) son of Matilda Countess D'Anjou BeauclercPlantagenet Planatagenet
John Lackland King of England (1166 - 1216) son of Henry II King of England
Henry III Plantagenet (1207 - 1272) son of John Lackland King of England
Edward II King of England Plantagenet (1284 - 1327) son of Edward I Longshanks England Plantagenet
Edward III King of England Plantagenet (1312 - 1377) son of Edward II King of England Plantagenet
Thomas Plantagenet (1355 - 1397) son of Edward III King of England Plantagenet
Anne Plantagenet (1383 - 1438) daughter of Thomas Plantagenet
Sir Humphrey Bourchier (1435 - 1471) son of John Lord Berners Bouchier
Lady Margaret (Baroness Bryan) Bourchier (1468 - 1552) daughter of Sir Humphrey Bourchier
son of Sir Francis Bryan, Lord Marshal of Ireland 'The Vicar of Hell'
Francis III Bryan (1630 - 1694) son of Sir William Smith Bryan (Knight)
Morgan Bryan (1671 - 1763) son of Francis III Bryan
son of Morgan Bryan
Hiram (Hurum) Bryant Senior (1792 - 1836) son of William Christopher Bryant
Huram (Hiram) Bryant (1827 - 1875) son of Hiram (Hurum) Bryant Senior
Lourena R Bryant (1855 - 1924) daughter of Huram (Hiram) Bryant
John Havens (1882 - 1960) son of Lourena R Bryant
Fern Lucille Havens (1925 - 1994) daughter of John Havens
William James Lambert, Jr (1942 - ) son of Fern Lucille Havens


Jennie Joann (Bush) Lambert – Pedigree Ties to French Nobility / English Royalty
through her Paternal (Bush) Line (Partial Listing Only)

Robert II Devil Magnificent Normandy (999 - 1035)
Jennie’s 30th great grandfather
son of Robert II Devil Magnificent Normandy
son of William the Conqueror
daughter of Henry I Beauclerc King England
son of Matilda Countess D'Anjou BeauclercPlantagenet Planatagenet
son of Henry II King of England "Curt Mantel" Plantagenet
son of John Lackland King of England
son of Henry III Plantagenet
son of Edward I Longshanks England Plantagenet
son of Edward II King of England Plantagenet
son of Edward III Plantagenet
son of John Gaunt Plantagenet
son of Henry England Plantagenet
daughter of Thomas Clarence deLancaster
son of Margaret DeLancaster
son of William Whitfield
son of William Whitfield
son of Richard Whitfield
son of Myles Whitfield
son of Robert Whitfield
son of Robert Whitfield
son of Thomas Whitfield
daughter of Henry Whitfield
son of Abigail Whitfield
daughter of James (Major) Fitch
son of Lucy Fitch
son of William Cleveland
daughter of Jedediah Cleveland
son of Clarissa "Clara" Cleveland
daughter of Jedidiah Cleveland Parsons
daughter of Mary Parsons
son of Jennie S. Wheeler

William James Lambert, Jr. – Pedigree Listing ties to the French Monarchy Follows
Additional lines to 1801 are being researched

Louis IX King of France Capet "St. Louis" (1215 - 1270)
     20th great grandfather of  William J. Lambert, Jr. 
Philippe III King of France Capet (1245 - 1285) son of Louis IX of France Capet "St. Louis"
Philip IV King of France Capet (1268 - 1314) son of Philippe III King of France Capet
Isabella of France Capet Plantagenet (1292 - 1358) daughter of Philip IV King of France Capet
Edward III King of England Plantagenet (1312 - 1377) son of Isabella of France Capet Plantagenet [aka, King of France and King of England]
Thomas Plantagenet (1355 - 1397) son of Edward III King of England Plantagenet
Anne Plantagenet (1383 - 1438) daughter of Thomas Plantagenet
Sir Humphrey Bourchier (1435 - 1471) son of John Lord Berners Bouchier
Lady Margaret (Baroness Bryan) Bourchier (1468 - 1552) daughter of Sir Humphrey Bourchier
SIR FRANCIS II Bryan (1549 - 1640) son of Sir Francis Bryan, Lord Marshal of Ireland 'The Vicar of Hell'
Francis III Bryan (1630 - 1694) son of Sir William Smith Bryan (Knight)
Morgan Bryan (1671 - 1763) son of Francis III Bryan
William Bryan (1734 - 1780) son of Morgan Bryan
Hiram (Hurum) Bryant Senior (1792 - 1836) son of William Christopher Bryant
Huram (Hiram) Bryant (1827 - 1875) son of Hiram (Hurum) Bryant Senior
Lourena R Bryant (1855 - 1924) daughter of Huram (Hiram) Bryant
John Havens (1882 - 1960) son of Lourena R Bryant
Fern Lucille Havens (1925 - 1994)  daughter of John Havens
William James Lambert, Jr (1942 - ) son of Fern Lucille Havens

-  William 



Thursday, March 13, 2014

Your Irish If . . .

You are the sons, daughters, grandchildren of William and/or Jennie (Bush) Lambert, Florence (Bush) Hines, or Robert William Bush (Senior).
Jennie’s Irish Heritage: Through Maternal Mitochondria DNA (mtDNA) Jennie has traced her Irish ancestor to Jane Blair, born about 1715 in Tyrone, Ireland. She immigrated to America about 1725, died in Concord, Delaware, Pennsylvania. Interestingly, she married Peter Moesta Naucett, born in Italy, son of an Italian father and German mother (more holidays to celebrate). There is some discussion as to where they married, in Ireland or PA, so the search continues. Meanwhile the pedigree line is as follows:
 
Jane Blair (1715 - ? ), Tyrone, Ireland, is Jennie’s 8th great grandmother through . . .

Ann Naucett (1743 - 1818) daughter of Jane Blair
Hannah Ann Hannum (1759 - 1819) daughter of Ann Naucett
Sarah Davis (1778 - 1851) daughter of Hannah Ann Hannum
Maria Hartsough (1803 - 1885) daughter of Sarah Davis
Sarah Ann Sheets (1823 - ) daughter of Maria Hartsough
Elizabeth Joanna Summers (1844 - 1911) daughter of Sarah Ann Sheets
Rosa Jeanette Street (1872 - 1913) daughter of Elizabeth Joanna Summers
Elizabeth Joann Higgenbotham (1902 - 1988) daughter of Rosa Jeanette Street
Florence Mae Hines (1923 - 2012) daughter of Elizabeth Joann Higgenbotham
Jennie Joann Bush daughter of Florence Mae Hines  

If Jennie’s relationship to you is an “aunt” then you can still can claim this ancestry and your ‘Irishness,” but your mtDNA line is through your mother. 

Of course there are other ways to trace our heritage to Ireland. So, you’re also Irish if 
you are sons, daughters or grandchildren of Robert W. Bush (Senior).

Through this paternal line your Irish ancestor is John M. Longwell b: 1715 in Londonderry, Ireland d: 1749 in Stonington, Fairfield County, CT. (or Stamford CT). However, his parents were English from Cornwall. (Possibly Orangemen, however, so don't bring this part up on St, Patrick’s day.)
Notes for from Michael Todd Helebrant (http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/h/e/l/Michael-T-Helebrant/GENE4-0023.html) John M. Longwell:
JOHN LONGWELL: The first evidence of this John Longwell was his marriage to SUSANNAH CLASON in Stamford, Fairfield Cty., CT. on 18 December 1735, by Sam(ue) Hoit, J. P. She was born 2 December 1716, and was the daughter of STEPHEN and ABIGAIL GREEN CLASON. (They were married 27 April 1709. His occupation was "Cordwinder" (rope maker) or perhaps "Cordwainer" (shoemaker). He is said to have come to America in a sailing vessel from the North of Ireland and was of Scotch Irish descent. The Scotch Irish were Scotch and English people who had gone to Ireland to take up the estates of Irish rebels confiscated under Queen Elizabeth and King James I. They were also known as Ulstermen. JOHN LONGWELL was probably born in 1715. John settled in Stamford CT. where his children were born. 

John, being a cordwinder and living near the shipping ports along Long Island Sound, probably worked on the docks. He is listed as having died in 1749 at Stonington CT., near Mystic Seaport. In those days whaling vessels were built at Mystic Seaport and they needed ropes (lines or cords). John's exact burial place has not been located. It is probably in the Stonington area of CT. 
In any event, John (Langwell) Longwell (1659 - 1749) would be Jennie’s 7th great grandfather according to the following pedigree:

Sir John Longwell (1690 - 1790) son of John (Langwell) Longwell
John Longwell (1716 - 1749) (Born in Ireland) son of Sir John Longwell
James Longwell (1736 - 1814) son of John Longwell
Adonijah Longwell (1791 - 1852) son of James Longwell
Eliza Ann Longwell (1824 - 1900) daughter of Adonijah Longwell
Wesley Bush (1845 - 1917) son of Eliza Ann Longwell
Harvey Ray Bush (1886 - 1961) son of Wesley Bush
Robert William Bush (Sr.) (1920 - 1999) son of Harvey Ray Bush
Jennie Joann Bush daughter of Robert Bush (Sr.)

Now, then, you are really, really Irish if the following line holds together. Currently, there is some discussion among genealogists about an aspect of this connection. Hopefully someone will take up the challenge of further research on this. Meanwhile, this is too good to not pass along. This family goes back to early medieval times. It is best to let the historians explain. Please read about the Butlers at: http://www.concentric.net/~mlbutler/butlers.htm  

Following this line, our Irish ancestry goes back to Sir Theobald I Fitzwalter Walter (1165 - 1206), who is Jennie’s 24th great grandfather through:
Sir Theobald Butler LeBoteler  (1200 - 1230) son of Sir Theobald I Fitzwalter Walter
Sir Theobald Butler LeBoteler (1223 - 1248) son of Sir Theobald Butler LeBoteler
THEOBALD, 4th Butler of Ireland, 1st Lord of Botiller, BUTLER (1242 - 1285) son of Sir Theobald Butler LeBoteler
Edmund Sir Carrick Justice Butler Boteler (1271 - 1321) son of THEOBALD, 4th Butler of Ireland, 1st Lord of Botiller, BUTLER
James 1st Earl of Ormonde Butler (1305 - 1338) son of Edmund Sir Carrick Justice Butler Boteler
James 2nd Earl of Ormond Butler (1331 - 1382) son of James 1st Earl of Ormonde Butler
James (3rd Earl of Ormond) Butler (1362 - 1405) son of James 2nd Earl of Ormond Butler
James Butler, 4th Earl of Ormond (1392 - 1452) son of James (3rd Earl of Ormond) Butler
Thomas Butler, 7th Earl of Ormond (1426 - 1515) son of James Butler, 4th Earl of Ormond
Margaret Lady Ormond Butler (1454 - 1537) daughter of Thomas Butler, 7th Earl of Ormond
Anne Bold (1509 - ) daughter of Margaret Lady Ormond Butler
Henry Boteler (1523 - 1580) son of Anne Bold
Thomas Butler (1555 - 1583) son of Henry Boteler
Robert Butler Pennoyer (1580 - 1625) son of Thomas Butler
Stephen (Robert) Pennoyer (1614 - 1671) son of Robert Butler Pennoyer
Elizabeth Periment (1631 - 1714) daughter of Stephen (Robert) Pennoyer
Jonathan Clason (1655 - 1685) son of Elizabeth Periment
Stephen Clason (1681 - 1746) son of Jonathan Clason
Susanna Clason (1716 - 1749) daughter of Stephen Clason
James Longwell (1736 - 1814) son of Susanna Clason
Adonijah Longwell (1791 - 1852) son of James Longwell
Eliza Ann Longwell (1824 - 1900) daughter of Adonijah Longwell
Wesley Bush (1845 - 1917) son of Eliza Ann Longwell
Harvey Ray Bush (1886 - 1961) son of Wesley Bush
Robert William Bush (Sr.) (1920 - 1999) son of Harvey Ray Bush
Jennie Joann Bush Daughter of Robert William Bush (Sr.)

The above pedigrees and references relate Jennie’s ancestry to Ireland. But that is only “1/3rd ” of the story. Another third is William’s ties, as outlined in our previous blog: Remembering Sir Francis Bryan: William’s 10th great grandfather, (b. Abt. 1 June 1490 – d. 2 Feb 1550). That blog outlines William’s ties to the nobility and controlling influence of several Irish families going back centuries, including Fitz-Geralds, Desmonds, Ormonds and Butlers. Some of these families are noted in Jennie’s above discussions and web references, which lead to the third aspect. William’s and Jennie’s heritage in Ireland is deep, convoluted and intertwined. This was also discussed in the previous blog on President Kennedy’s Irish connections, to which both William and Jennie’s ancestors “relate.” And, guess what! This not the complete story; just enough to get you through St. Patrick’s Day. Future blogs may seek answers to such questions as, why are there so many Lamberts in Ireland, and why were ancient Irish noble families with roots in America, Denmark and the “Netherlands” fighting against Ireland? Think Bryant, William of Orange and the separation of Ireland. Can William actually be “Green” and “Orange” at the same time? Stay tuned, but for now just enjoy being Irish and . . .

Enjoy a little Gaelic:   Saol fada chugat – Long Life to You, Slainte – Cheers (to your health)

Éirinn go Brách  - “Ireland Forever”

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Remembering Sir Francis Bryan: 10th great grandfather

Francis Bryan
The image of Sir Francis Bryan (Left) is believed to be from the Irish-Canadian production "The Tudors.This is a theatrical construct from various sources, as no actual image exists of Sir Francis, which is strange given the immense role he played in Tudor Court and personal relationship with Henry VIII and other Tudor royalty, personal family nobility, government and European matters. He is shown here in period dress with some of the trappings of office. The eye patch, which became necessary due to a jousting accident, adds to his roguish reputation. He was also a sea captain in the royal navy, but not sure if ever a pirate.

February 2, 1550, marks the day William’s 10th great grandfather (ggf), Sir Francis Bryan died, and was buried at Waterford, Ireland. Four hundred and sixty-four years is a long time to be dead, especially if poisoned (alleged) by your Irish noble family wife because she really wanted to marry her close relative, Irish nobleman Gerald Fitz-Gerald. Well, after all, it was an “arranged” marriage to ensure English control over Ireland. If she did the deed (never proven), it took some real doing because at the time her Husband, Sir Francis Bryan, was the Lord Marshall of Ireland, the Lord Chief Justice of Ireland (aka, Supreme Chief Magistrate), and carried the epitaph, “Vicar of Hell.” One good thing to come out of that short marriage (1548-1550) to Lady Joan Butler (dowager Duchess of Ormond (d/o James FitzGerald, 10th Earl of Desmond and Amy O'Brien) was a son, Francis Byran II, who inherited estates in County Clare. His son, William Smith Bryan (Knight), William’s 8th great grandfather, was dubbed the “the Prince of Ireland” by his followers and patrons.

Historically, the Bryan clan claims linkage to royal and noble ancestors in early England, Ireland and France. Although some genealogical archives are murky on details, the record is clearer through the medieval periods. It was not unreasonable, therefore, for Bryan II’s son, William Smith Bryan (knight) to contend for the Irish throne. This appears even more reasonable because of his lineage to Ireland’s High King, Brian Boru, who reigned 1002-1014. This, and his grandmother being the d/o of Turlough O’Brien, the King of Munster/High King of Ireland, indicate additional ties to the royal/noble O’Brian/O’Brien clan. Additionally, he bears lineages through the Butler’s Earls/Dukes of Ormond (Anglo-Irish nobility). Regardless of how one slices it, William S. Bryan had every right to the Irish throne. However . . . .

As part of the “reconquest of Ireland” (1649 -1653), England’s Puritan ruler, Oliver Cromwell considered the “Prince of Ireland” a rebel and a threat, and forced William S. Bryan to abandon Ireland. William was forced to load his family, considerable household goods, livestock, including horses, and ship off for the Colonies. The ship arrived in Gloucester Beach (Point), Virginia, Abt. 1650. (See photo at end of article)

The Bryan family's role in the early development of colonial America is an interesting history that involves a number of Bryan/Bryant relationships in the early settling of VA, KY and NC, including the marriage of Lourena (aka Louraine) R. Bryant to William’s great grandfather, Samuel Havens in KY. Because there were a number of interrelated Boone/Bryant/Havens/Lambert connections, these extend William’s genealogy to include the Boone family as well as others. However, those stories will have to wait for another Blog.

Sir Francis Bryan’s ancestors hold a pivotal place in both our genealogies. Both William and Jennie’s ancestors’ found themselves frolicking, scheming and thoroughly engrossed in medieval shenanigans’ in England’s Henry VIII’s Court. Sir Francis’s father and grandfather were nobles in Henry VII’s Court. Young Henry VIII and young Francis knew each other well. Francis was related to at least four of Henry VIII’s six wives, knew all of them well, and was instrumental in arranging liaisons and other necessities for Henry. He also spent some time with the Parr family. (Catherine Parr was Henry VIII’s sixth wife). Francis’ Mother, Lady Margaret Bryan, was governess of young Henry VIII, and later was governess to Henry VIII’s children, all being future monarchs of England, Britain, France and Ireland.

Sir Francis’ reputation garnered him a number of labels, but one that chroniclers like to apply is “the Vicar of Hell.” This is primarily because of his lack of defense for his cousin (Henry VIII’s second wife), Anne Boleyn. Others contend the epitaph could be equally applied because of his sinister plots and intrigues at home and abroad on behalf of Henry, giving rise to a more recent label, “the medieval James Bond.”

For those who would like to learn more about the many positions, adventures and lineages associated with this ancestor, a good place to start is: http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1509-1558/member/bryan-sir-francis-1492-1550 . Background on the Bryan clan, their exploits in early America and associations with the Boone clan is reviewed in, Bryan, A Pioneer Family at:  http://knightsdebryan.freeservers.com/pioneer.htm

Pedigree of William James Lambert, Jr. to Sir Francis Bryan,
 William’s 10th great grandfather:

Sir Francis Bryan, Lord Marshal of Ireland, MP, “The Vicar of Hell” (Abt. 1490 - 1550)
William’s 10th great grandfather 
son of Sir Francis Bryan (Bryan I)
Sir William Smith Bryan (Knight) (1600 - 1667) [Dubbed: “Prince of Ireland”]
son of Sir Frances II Bryan
son of Sir William Smith Bryan (Knight)
Morgan Bryan (1671 - 1763) [Stem of Kentucky Bryan/Bryant family]
son of Francis III Bryan
William Bryan (1734 - 1780) [Married Mary Boone, Sister of Daniel Boone]
son of Morgan Bryan
son of William Bryan
son of William Christopher Bryant
son of Hiram (Hurum) Bryant Senior
Lourena [Louraine] R Bryant (1855 - 1924) – [Married Samuel Havens, 1879]
daughter of Huram (Hiram) Bryant
John Havens (1883 - 1960) [Married Elisabeth May, 1907]
son of Lourena R Bryant
Fern Lucille Havens (1925 - 1994) [Married William J. Lambert]
daughter of John Havens
son of Fern Lucille Havens


This is from a photo taken at Gloucester Point, VA when we visited the area during the summer of 2013. This is the area where the Bryan clan came ashore in 1650 following expulsion from Ireland by Lord Protector Cromwell.                                                   An interesting aside: When we visited Lambert's Point, Norfolk, VA, just south of Gloucester Point, we stopped at the Lambert's Point visitor office. Turns out the lady we talked to was the great granddaughter of the dreaded Oliver Cromwell, noted in the above article. The Lambert name was familiar to her for a number of reasons, but an interesting one is that Major General John Lambert was a chief deputy of Cromwell during his military exploits and civil wars in England. At one time MG Lambert was referred to as the second most powerful person in England. (Relative: unknown at this juncture, but a work in progress).
                                                                                                                       >>>> William

  

Friday, January 31, 2014

Reflections. Part III – Pursuing Ancestors: Pedigree Genealogy – Who’s really related!

Pedigree genealogy is the tracing and documenting of one’s familial lineage, sometimes referred to as a “family tree.” It documents hereditary lines of ancestry, relying on verifiable records. DNA analysis may be used to augment or substantiate some pedigree genealogy. But, it is probably not going to satisfy the way a well-constructed pedigree chart can, complete with names, personal stories and historical context.
In Part I we discussed a number of reasons to get involved in genealogy. Among these were family history, proving heredity, being accepted into genealogical societies (e.g., DAR, SAR, Mayflower, Augustan), participating in surname projects or a tie-in to historical personages and/or events, etc.
In Part II, we looked at various understandings about the idea that we are all related. Our conclusion was that, indeed, we are all connected. This holds whether one decides to take the faith-based or various scientific approaches. We also acknowledged that this kind of “proof” of connectedness does not do much for satisfying the reasons why most people engage in genealogy.
Now, in part III, we are going to examine the idea that while we may all be related at some esoteric level, this may not be explicit at the pedigree level. Also, while many people are undoubtedly connected to amazing “others”, both presently and throughout history, proving it could be a bit problematic – albeit adventurous.
When Jennie and William assert they have an unusual intertwined genealogy they are primarily speaking about verifiable lineage, or verifiable pedigree genealogy. However, this is not a claim of exclusivity. Undoubtedly, many others, even millions, can have similar pedigree lines. What we do claim, however, is that our pedigree search continues to reveal uncommon ancestry relationships and elaborate interconnected associations that are not only unusual, but that these lines crisscross throughout several historical periods and events. Moreover, these lines appear to be traceable through multiple pedigree lineages to considerable historical depth. It is exciting enough when someone has a single parent that can provide a special linage. When that same person has both parents providing a portal of lineages it raises the genealogical ante to “unusual.” When the other half of a couple has both parents providing a portal to the same historical framework, then the statistics enter into the “distinctive” range. We appear to have the latter genealogical pattern. Our combined offspring, therefore, face an interesting genealogical journey, should they choose to participate in it.
If ancestors on both our sides had not been at the right place at the right time, where pedigree was a matter of survival and procreation, where keeping heraldic and other records was an obsession, we would not be able to validate the lineages we have to this point. In fact, we probably would not be here at all – and neither would the relatives reading this blog. So, before we go any further we need to take a moment to get some perspective on how all of this came about.
A Genealogical Excursion: For the first few thousand years of “recorded” history humans conveyed the story of their lives and clans mainly by verbal story-telling, augmented by hieroglyphs and cave paintings. From the beginning of the great civilizations, some 6000 years ago, until the start of the Common Era (CE, or 0 AD), if one’s ancestors were of noble lineage they probably left some sort of record of their achievements, demise and burial. Likewise, in Ireland, England, and greater Europe, ancient clans, tribes and kings were documenting their turfs and leaving a genealogical trail. However, the rest of humanity (99.99+%), those who toiled the fields, built structures, served in the military, were servants or slaves, anonymously returned to their earthly origins, leaving scarce records of existence. One notable example during the latter half of this period, and still used as a genealogical reference, is the Jewish-Hebrew genealogic archives within the Old Testament Bible and linked documents. However, this, too, was essentially a record of nobles.
Life in those early times was harsh and short. Disease, famine, conflict and other threats conspired to keep the average life expectancy to less than 35 years. Childbirth claimed an extravagant number of women, many in their early teens. Providing infants survived childbirth, between 50% and 70% of children would die within five years; most within the first year. These numbers did not significantly improve for ordinary people until near the 20th century, and then primarily for those with ways and means to ensure their survival. Several centuries of plagues wiped out 1/4th to 3/4ths of the population in Europe and elsewhere. These events, and centuries of “total war” during the medieval and Reformation periods removed countless millions more from the reproductive pool, and destroyed related records. The Age of exploration (1400s-1700s) brought mass genocide of native and culturally “different” peoples, as well as the enigmas of actual slavery and religious inquisitions. Many millions, including children, died in the filth, squalor and slave-like conditions of the early industrial revolution (1700s-1800s). In the USA, a result of these events was hundreds of thousands of “orphan” children, sometimes shipped by the trainload, to work sites and foster/adoptive parents in the Midwest and beyond (1850s-1920s). Untold thousands lost their identify and pedigree. Through all of the above, the rich and powerful had the ways and means to protect themselves and significant others; to thrive, procreate and to keep records.
After consolidation of the early Roman Catholic Church in Europe (Circ. 300 CE) some common folk got a break. Births, baptisms, marriages, deaths and burials were “religiously” recorded by parish affiliation. Didn’t belong to a parish? Born outside of marriage? Not baptized? Scant “paper trail” there. Moreover, during the first 18 centuries, CE, millions of church and public records were lost due to wars, fires, plagues, and natural disasters. Overwhelming numbers of deaths, mass burials cremations and a lack of scribes also took their toll on genealogical records. Around 600-800 CE surnames began to emerge, usually connected to nobility, landmarks, or trades. However, surnames resembling anything close to modern usage did not develop until after the age of discovery (1400s). Census and tax rolls helped document existence, but primarily for the few with property. The vast majority of common people (e.g., serfs, slaves and transients) weren’t considered worth the effort. Numbers sometimes; names, almost never. Females were especially degraded in significance, even among nobility they were often little more than economic-political chattel, except for a few royals.
About 500 years ago, world-wide massive dispersions of populations began. During the next several centuries millions would travel to “new worlds” and a mingling of culture would begin on a previously unthinkable scale. Expanded shipping and commerce manifests and census records offered documentation for additional people. Although genealogy was largely limited to nobility and the people and things they cared about. Notable families, especially in New England, maintained their heritage and kept records for their part of this “Great Migration.” In the 1800s photographs gave tangible evidence of existence. (Most didn’t include dates, places or names back then either!).
The bottom line of this short genealogical assessment of record keeping is humbling. If you’re genealogical linage was directly tied into European and Middle Eastern nobility (including kings, queens, nobles, church leaders and their close relatives) you probably have a pedigree portal that goes back 1-2 thousand years or more. Once a person finds themselves firmly linked to that spiraling heritage trek the connections are accessible and revealing. Conversely, if close ancestors were not part of a royal or noble lineage, being able to trace a pedigree line much beyond 300-400 years is difficult to unlikely.
So who do we think we are? Well, so far the journey suggests the following: Our ancestors reveal direct pedigree links to the kings, queens, dukes, earls, bishops, and their immediate relatives in what are now Ireland, Great Britain (N. Ireland; England; Scotland; Wales), France, Germany, Italy, Eastern Europe, Northern Europe, Middle East, Northern Africa, and other geographical venues. One way this happens is that nearly all of these people were “family.” They married, intermarried and left a clear trail of who was related to whom, why, and what of it. Once one is firmly tied into these records the “rest is history.” However, discovering those pedigree lines has not been easy. The genealogy pathway is strewn with road blocks, dead ends, misdirections, etc. As well as occasional ambivalence, on our part as well as others. So far, it has taken almost five decades of work, especially intense during the past decade, as well as several DNA tests and participating in a number of genealogical societies, settings and resources. Building on pedigree lines at home, we linked to genealogical roots abroad. Relatives of those “old” world notables came to the “new world” as part of the adventurous great migrations of the 1500s-1700s. Our ancestors were among the first waves to settle the “new world,” and included royalty, nobility, “pilgrims”, inn-keepers, traders, political leaders and titled farmers, as well as a few rouges and convicts. Fortunately, by this time good public records were being kept, such as crime and punishment, licenses, land grants, estate tax, wills, etc. Nevertheless, it appears a number of lesser known relatives simply vanished.
After establishing themselves in eastern North American seaboard colonies, our ancestor “pioneers” moved deeper into New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and other areas, occasionally crisscrossing paths. They were awarded land grants for service in the early English colonial-Native American wars, French-English Wars, American Revolutionary and the so-called War of 1812. They were among the first to settle areas in Virginia and current West Virginia, Ohio Western Reserve, Kentucky, and other areas. Others moved on and played early roles in settling the Midwest and Deep South.
Reflections III –  Epilog. Crucial to our premise about an unusual genealogical pedigree, is that the relationships expressed may be distinctive, but certainly are not exclusive. Through time, millions of essential, albeit unknown, people had offspring. Today their ancestors number in the hundreds of millions. However, they cannot link their DNA or pedigree records beyond a limited number (5-10) of generations. A small number might get back another few generations. The records and reference data simply doesn’t exist beyond this for the vast majority. For reasons previously noted, we are fairly confident it does for both of us. We find our ancestors living, working with and related to the nobility of Europe for some 1400 years. The ties and records appear to be substantive. Moreover, we tie into a number of “gateway” ancestors. (These are key figures in history where genealogical linkages converge, and/or serve as springboards to an array of historical pedigrees, such as, John Gaunt, Olive Welby, Duke of Normandy [aka, King William I, England], and Charlemagne.) We have discovered this through a mixture of genealogical tools, such as hereditary records, genealogy consultations, and DNA analysis. An interesting aspect of genealogy research is that the more information one has, the more doors are opened in a cascading fashion. It helps that World-wide data bases are rapidly coming on line.
-- William


Our next Blog will look at some less “reflective” aspects of our “tangled” family tree.